| |
|
|
| |
Welcome to another edition of Cox & Nici's E-News
where we inform you about current legal issues that
may affect you and your loved ones.
|
|
| |
|
New Supreme Court Ruling on Investment Advisory Fees for Trusts
Yes, it's that time again. Tax season is here and, if
you're like most people, you could probably use all the
help you can get; especially when it comes to staying
on top of changing tax law. On January 16th,
the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed in Knight
v.
Commissioner, that a trust's investment advisory
fees
are generally not fully deductible. The court held that
investment advisory fees paid by a trust are fully
deductible if they "would not have been incurred if the
property were not held in such trust; otherwise, they're
subject to the 2% floor and must exceed 2% of the
trust's adjusted gross income to be deductible".
Essentially, individual investors who pay investment
advisory fees are only allowed to claim an itemized
deduction for that expense if these fees together with
certain other "miscellaneous itemized deductions,"
such as unreimbursed employee expenses and tax
expenses, exceed 2% of the individual's adjusted
gross income.
Example:
 If your Adjusted Gross
Income (AGI) is
$200,000 and you pay $3,500 in investment advisory
fees and have $900 in other miscellaneous itemized
deductions totaling $4,400, under the new regulation,
you will only be allowed to
deduct $400 not $3,500, as a result of the "2% floor"
rule.
However, the ruling does allow for some fees to
be fully deductible. To be fully deductible, these fees
had to be those that "may have an unusual investment
objective, or may require a specialized balancing of
the interests of various parties." Also, if the costs
incurred in administering a trust wouldn't have been
incurred if the property weren't held by a trust, they may
be deducted without regard to the floor. As a result of
this regulation, trust companies may have to make
changes in the way they bill clients such as
unbundling their fees and what costs to allocate
to "unusual" and "uncommon" expenses.
Unfortunately, many trust companies or investment
firms don't
break out their investment-fee charge from other fees
but bundle them into a single fee instead. By not
unbundling fees to categorize those that are "unique"
products or services and "common" ones, you could
end up paying more taxes than you need.
|
|
|
| |
Thank you for reading this issue of Cox & Nici's
E-News. Please visit our website or call us for more
information regarding this subject or to answer any
other questions you may have.
Sincerely,

Joe B. Cox, Esq. & James R. Nici, Esq.
Cox & Nici
phone:
239-254-0706
| |
 |
 |
|
If you wish to contact Joe B. Cox or James R.
Nici directly, DO NOT REPLY to this
email! Regarding legal inquiries, contact:
Joe B.
Cox at jcox@coxnici.com
James R. Nici at jnici@coxnici.com
.
Reply to this email for technical assistance
only!
The hiring of a lawyer is an important dcision that
should bot be based solely upon advertisements.
Before your decide, ask us to send you free written
information about our qualifications and
experience. Rule 4-7.2(d) ADVERTISEMENT 2003-
2005
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|